Member Articles

The African Union’s recent inclusion in the G20 has raised questions about its readiness to represent Africa’s interests, and experts question the union’s ability to reach consensus on the continent’s priorities given divisions among member states.

As BRICS navigates the evolving global economic landscape, its trade, investment, and finance progress underscore its significance as a transformative force and a dynamic entity shaping the future contours of international economic relations.

Creative diplomacy is urgently needed in Cyprus given the stalemate and changing regional dynamics. This argues that a new agenda based on regional integration could further efforts to establish common ground.

Although bilateral relations between the EU and China are deteriorating, most Eastern European countries continue to promote BRI projects and seek to attract Chinese investments, suggesting that differences within Europe regarding China.

NATO has taken steps to maintain a credible deterrent in the face of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. To prevent an attack, it must demonstrate the ability to effectively respond to a full-scale conventional war for as long as it takes.

This examines whether the world’s governments will collaborate in the pursuit of democratic renewal or yield to systems of surveillance and control. It argues that it will depend on the capacities of citizens to hold their governments accountable.

While ASEAN is an essential player in Indo-Pacific affairs, its influence over the emerging security shifts in the region is being questioned. Therefore, to maintain its credibility, ASEAN should consider structural and cultural reform.

The Quad should continue focusing on delivering its promises and building on areas of success. The Quad’s success is imperative for an open and secure Indo-Pacific.

This summarizes the key points from the tenth Financial Regulatory Outlook Conference, which examined the potential evolution of the monetary order amid inflationary pressures and global challenges.

This article argues that the Abraham Accords process is exclusive and disregards the foundational principles of regional peace, and proposes how to make it a more inclusive process.